VulnerabilityScanPro
All articles
// ENGINEERING

OWASP Top 10 2026: what actually changed

The 2026 revision is more than a rename. Three categories merged, server-side request forgery moves up, and one new category captures supply-chain risk. Here's what your security review needs to cover.

Vulnerabilityscanpro admin
Vulnerabilityscanpro admin
Apr 26, 2026 6 min read
OWASP Top 10 2026: what actually changed

The big shifts

  • A01 Broken Access Control stays at #1, broader scope
  • A02 Cryptographic Failures absorbed parts of the old A05
  • A03 Injection narrows — XSS moved into a dedicated category
  • A04 Insecure Design keeps its slot — design-level review still distinct from code review
  • A05 Security Misconfiguration — same scope, more emphasis on defaults
  • A06 Vulnerable & Outdated Components — supply-chain reasoning expanded
  • A07 Identification & Authentication Failures — session-token storage explicitly called out
  • A08 Software & Data Integrity Failures — CI/CD, signed artifacts
  • A09 Logging & Monitoring — same as before, but with detection-engineering language
  • A10 SSRF moved up from honorable mention

What changed in our checklist

We added explicit tests for:

  1. Token storage on the clientlocalStorage vs httpOnly cookies, with the assumption that a single XSS will exfiltrate any token JS can read
  2. Build pipeline integrity — branch protections, signed releases, dependency provenance
  3. SSRF surface — webhook receivers, image-fetchers, URL-preview endpoints
  4. Edge-case CSP'unsafe-inline' analysis, hash-based vs nonce-based

How to use this list

The Top 10 isn't a compliance checklist. It's a memory aid. Walk every endpoint and ask, for each of the ten categories, could this fail here? If you can't answer with conviction, that endpoint is in scope for review.


// tags: #owasp #top 10 #reference